Inputs are checked before calculation.
Missing or uncertain information is identified instead of hidden.
Approach
A clear progression, from raw data to technical decision.
The mission is organized to control information, explain hypotheses and provide understandable deliverables.
01
Framing of the mission
Objective, scope, necessary data and deliverables.
02
Data analysis
Consistency check and identification of gaps.
03
Calculations & scenarios
System sizing, energy-yield assessment and financial analysis.
04
Production of deliverables
Report, plans, tables and recommendations.
05
Restitution
Explanation, limits, answers and next decisions.
What makes the mission strong
The method remains visible, even after delivery.
Results are more useful when you understand where they come from and what they actually decide.
The technical choices are explained.
The reader can find the parameters which influence the result.
Third-party validations are distinguished.
Structure, geotechnics, diagnostics and specific regulatory studies are not confused with the PV study.
Recommendations result in action.
The deliverable indicates what can be decided and what still needs to be confirmed.
Organization of exchanges
A technical contact and a defined perimeter.
At start-up, the list of documents, deadline and deliverables are confirmed. During the study, blocking questions are grouped together in order to maintain an effective exchange. The restitution serves to validate the understanding of the results.